Fifteen minutes

You know the reason for my lack of ability to write anything over these last few days? I think it was my low level, subconscious anxiety over the interview M and I were going to undergo for a local tv current affairs type show on Monday afternoon. Yes, the short comment M left in response to that SMH article has really led off in all sorts of directions. I still don’t quite understand the media’s current interest in online games, and I’m still a bit peeved at the overly sensational approach they seem to be taking, but I’m quite amused at M’s and my contribution to the discussion.

On Thursday last week a producer for said current affairs show (which shall remain nameless for the time being) contacted M and asked if they could interview us. They were going to be interviewing “another couple” (hint: Cozalcoatl and her husband) and wanted to hear from us as well, as “highly educated and in their thirties which fits the profile of people who are spending lots of time playing these type of games”. I thought M would say no (he’d already refused the radio interview), but to my surprise he was quite keen. Who was I to say no? I decided that I would remember my new year’s resolutionto do my best with every opportunity I come across – so I agreed, with some trepidation.

You’ll laugh at my first response to the idea of being interviewed for tv, though. All I was worried about was: “Will I have to wear make up?” Then I started wondering what they would do, what sorts of questions they would ask, and how we would appear to anyone who watches the show: “Gee, what a pair of nerds!” And what if the camera man stepped on Baubles the Cat? Thankfully, that last worry snapped me out of it and I stopped running through worst case scenarios in my head. I had a fairly enjoyable weekend and didn’t really think about the impending interview, but I’m sure it affected me anyway, despite my best efforts.

Anyway, the reporter came over yesterday and it was completely not what I was expecting.

  • I was expecting slickly dressed professionals, but the reporter, a guy called Graham, didn’t even introduce himself properly – and he was wearing a crumpled white shirt and crumpled black trousers, and his shoe laces weren’t tied. The camera woman was in shorts and sandshoes, as was her assistant (what do they call the person who does the setting up, and holds the piece of white card in front of the camera before they start filming?). I had a brief moment of suspicion that they were really home invaders and they would rush in once we were off our guard, and steal all the books and Baubles the Cat… but that was my imagination running away with me again!
  • No one said anything about makeup or even commented on how we looked. They just put lots of lights everywhere and started filming.
  • The reporter seemed to not have any idea what he was going to say at all! All he had was a piece of paper with some scribbled notes on it – the email M sent to the producer – and he didn’t even seem to know our names, or that we were ‘together’, asking “You guys are together, yeh?” He didn’t know a thing about games, and wasn’t particularly interested either (although the camera woman did tell us he was an avid gardener! hah!). I suppose he was just doing his job.
  • Completely unrehearsed, the reporter just sat facing us (they filmed us over his shoulder so I guess viewers won’t actually see his crumpled state) and asked questions. I was quite amused by the really over the top facial expressions he pulled as he spoke to us. I almost couldn’t bear to look at him because I was worried I would burst out laughing, or worse, start mimicing him! “So, what’s fun about games?[grimace]”, or “Isn’t it really, well, nerdy, to be playing games? [grimace]”. It’s a pity I can’t really remember exactly what he asked us, except to say it was entirely what we expected. “Would you say you are addicted? [grimace]”
  • I think I actually said more than M did! Who’da thunk? I kept making analogies to other hobbies/interests. “What’s so strange about getting engrossed in a game? It’s just like reading a good novel you can’t put down and spend all night reading. No one says that is addictive behaviour, you are just enjoying yourself!”
  • After the actual interview, they needed shots of us being a couple (the reporter’s words), so we spent a good few minutes posing over one of my unfinished jigsaw puzzles while poor M was made to keep pouring Heineken beer into a glass for me. They have shots of us talking inanely while drinking beer and me peering at my jigsaw puzzle, which was not even the right way up (sideways)! Of course, they also filmed us in our games room playing WoW.
  • No one stepped on Baubles the Cat, although the reporter did exclaim when he saw her: “She’s quite a sight!” and I think she kept him and the assistant amused while the camera woman filmed us running our characters around in WoW. I did notice her rubbing herself on the reporter’s shoe during the interview. I think he chose to ignore her. (Baubles the Cat has a thing for leather and loves rolling around on leather garments of any description. I won’t mention what she does to suede.)

The whole process took an hour. We have no idea when (or if) we will appear on telly. Apparently they’re going to have to send their footage over to Sydney, and it’ll all be put together there. The camera woman remarked that for every hour of filming and setting up, they usually end up actually using only a minute or so of the footage. I’m not going to worry about appearing on national prime time tv for the time being. After all, they might not even use the footage they took of us.

I’m relieved it’s over, and hopefully the producer of the other show who contacted us won’t decide that he wants to interview us after all. He really wanted “addicts” and M told him we wouldn’t fit the bill.

Categories:

7 Comments

Kris 23 January 2006

It’s a shame the reporters themselves didn’t seem even a little bit enthused. To not care about what story you’re telling, to me, is just living life as a slave to the wage!

CW 23 January 2006

Yeh, I agree. I was quite surprised at his lack of preparation, too. I dunno if that was just a front for him to try and get us to talk. The camera woman was more interested than the reporter himself, but she wasn’t doing any of the official talking…

mooiness 24 January 2006

Hmm, sounds a bit dodgy to me. I’ve seen enough of Frontline to suspect this: the reporter didn’t dress up because he wouldn’t be appearing on screen. Instead, some slick looking dude would be added in later, and it would be his vouce asking the same questions to you guys.

Oh and I’d watch out for some sneaky editing too. Knowing their “addict” angle.

Heheh ok ok I think I might just get you paranoid again. πŸ˜›

cherryripe 24 January 2006

*Sighs* This sounds dubious. But it’s out of your hands now so i guess we’ll just have to wait and see…
p/s Bad bad Mooiness for trying to re-paranoia-ise you. πŸ˜‰

Cozalcoatl 24 January 2006

The people who came over to film us were a bit more professional and very friendy. The sound guy was very interested in out ferret.
The lady reporter (nicely dressed) got some background questions then, asked them back to us on camera. She did seem interested and didn’t think we were complete freaks,i think. They filmed us playing, eating dinner and drinking wine. She wanted to get a outdoor cafe shot of us the next day (to show that we do leave the house or something) but i think i had too much wine the night before and just couldn’t be arsed driving 40 minutes through peak hour to meet Rob at his work. She may ring us back or not…
Another show contacted me but we declined, abit to much attention for something that isn’t that interesting or odd.
But is was kinda fun to see how these things work. Now to find someone with a tv so we can watch it when/if it gets aired.

anna 24 January 2006

Hey CW, I hope that the final product is true to your words and personality. Video editors can do ‘magic’ with footage (speaking from own experience as an editor!)

CW 24 January 2006

Mooiness and Cherry, I think I’ll just try to forget about what they may do with the film – at least until it goes live. Otherwise I’ll be in a right state for no real reason. After all, they may decide that M and I aren’t photogenic enough and only show our hands on the keyboard, or something, and then I’ll have stressed myself out for nothing πŸ˜‰

Cozalcoatl, yeh, it was well worth it just to have the experience. Now I can say “Interview for telly? Yep done that. Next!” As for getting a copy of the show, we have a digital tv tuner card so we might be able to make a digital copy of our segment – maybe we can send you a copy? That’s assuming they end up showing it, of course! πŸ™‚

Anna, I guess we’ll have to wait and see… It should be interesting to see what they choose to show, actually…